Every changevisualized and reviewed
Version control for engineering document sets:
docx, excel, PDF, drawings, images, 3D models, and more.
Integrates with
$100M+
at risk when errors reach the customer
2 weeks
lost to a single resubmission
100%
of teams slip under deadline pressure
Update files
Miss two references to the old spec
Export every document to PDF
Upload PDFs to a Bluebeam session
Hope the compare tool doesn't flag the entire sheet
Review in Bluebeam
Reviewers approve with minor edits
Intermediate changes not re-reviewed
Second round of approvals, less attention
Bluebeam session closed, comments saved who-knows-where
Update files — Kord syncs automatically
AI flags the Concept of Ops still references 150 psig
Kord detects the changes
Kord groups the changes into a review session
Review visual diffs across every format
Approve — changes publish with a full audit trail
Step 1
Edit files. Kord syncs.
Your shared drive
Step 2
See exactly what changed
Aligning pages...
Want to see it on your own files? Try the free diff tool — no login, nothing stored.
Step 3
AI catches what humans miss
Cross-document checking
Reads the whole document set for inconsistencies
Proposed fixes
Suggests the edits needed to bring docs back in sync
Human approval
Every AI edit goes through a review session
Inlet pressure still references 150 psig
Expected: 120 psig
MAWP still shows 150 psig
Expected: 120 psig
Valve CV sized for 150 psig upstream — flow rate changed
Resizing required for 120 psig operating pressure
Material spec SA-516 Gr.70 — may be over-spec for reduced pressure
Review: confirm material grade against updated MAWP
Step 4
Every change is reviewed
Have we confirmed backpressure at this set point? 132 psig with the downstream header pressure might be tight
Inline comments
On lines, cells, or pinned regions of any file
Reviewer sign-offs
Require approval before changes publish
Multi-file reviews
Related changes grouped into one session
Role-based access
Owner, admin, contributor, viewer, reviewer
Step 5
Ship with full traceability.
Named snapshots
What was approved and delivered
Delivery records
What was sent to the customer, and when
Release history
Every submittal and revision, in order
Folder Forking
Fork, customize, sync back
Fork your base design per customer site. Customize per project, then pull base improvements into every fork.
Zero-copy forking
Fork a document set instantly, no duplication
Bidirectional sync
Pull base updates into forks, push fork changes back
Per-site customization
Each site gets its own fork, still tied to base
Teams that deploy base designs at multiple sites
EPCs, modular equipment companies, and engineering teams that customize a standard design per customer.
A base design, customized per customer or site
Each deployment forks the document set
Delivery is iterative submittals and customer review
Consistency lives in email, Slack, and tribal knowledge
The structured review layer between file storage and PLM
Files live in SharePoint or Drive. PLM handles parts. Kord is the missing layer: document-set change management with visual diffs, structured reviews, and AI consistency checks.
Markup & compare
Bluebeam, Adobe
Strong file-level markup and compare, but markups stay siloed — no document-set version control or cross-format review.
Document control & CDE
Aconex, ProjectWise
Compares one document against its prior version and tracks status — not a mixed-format package diff or cross-document check.
PLM / QMS
Arena, Teamcenter, Windchill
Part- and configuration-centric — the wrong abstraction for a mixed-format submittal package as the review unit.
Engineering document review, explained
Common questions from EPC, modular equipment, and hardware teams.